Uloga civilnih i političkih aktera u procesima institucionalne reforme i razvoja kapaciteta pravosuđa u Srbiji od 2002. do 2012. godine
The role of civil and political actors in the process of institutional reform and capacity development of the judiciary in Serbia from 2002 to 2012
Author
Purić, Olivera V.Mentor
Stojiljković, ZoranCommittee members
Milenković, DejanPetrović, Vesna
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Rad istražuje ulogu i doprinos razvojne pomoći u procesu programiranja i
implementacije pravosudne reforme u Srbiji od 2002. do 2012. godine. Pojam razvojne
pomoći u ovom radu obuhvata donacije i projektnu pomoć međunarodnih partnera u širem
smislu, što obuhvata kako međunarodne organizacije tako i razvojne agencije i/ili programe
stranih država. Pod pravosudnom reformom rad primarno podrazumeva postizanje
nezavisnosti pravosuđa u čijoj je osnovi stručnost nosilaca pravosudne funkcije. Stoga,
posebno mesto u istaživanju zauzima jedinstveni slučaj transformacije Pravosudne
akademije od projekta do državne institucije u funkciji osnaživanja kriterijuma stručnosti.
Osnovna hipoteza rada je da je uspešnost reforme pravosuđa uslovljena primenom
kriterijuma stručnosti u izboru, vrednovanju i napredovanju nosilaca pravosudne funkcije.
Sprovedeno istraživanje potvrđuje hipotezu i donosi zaključak da nije postignut značajan
uspeh u reformi pravosuđa u Srbiji. Utvrdili smo da su stagnaciji refor...me doprineli, u
jednakoj meri, s jedne strane, međunarodni partneri nekoherentnim pristupom
programiranju reforme, a s druge, nacionalni partneri u Srbiji nedostatkom stvarne
potražnje za reformom. Sadejstvom ovih razvojnih partnera u primeni tehnika izomorfne
mimikrije i preuranjenog opterećenja došlo se do mešovitog rezultata - kapaciteti pravosuđa
u Srbiji su u izvesnoj meri uvećani ali nezavisnost suda nije. Rad na osnovu ovih nalaza
daje preporuke za unapređenje programiranja i realizaciju reforme pravosuđa kao što su
koherentni strateški mehanizmi, koordinacija razvojnih partnera i depolitizacija reformskog
procesa.
The study explores the role and contribution of development assistance within the
process of programming and implementation of judicial reform in Serbia from 2002 to
2012. The notion of development assistance, according to the study, includes donations and
project assistance from international partners in a wider sense such as from international
organizations, development agencies and/or bilateral assistance. The study defines judicial
reform as the independence of the judiciary, which is based on the competency of judges
and prosecutors. Thus, special attention is given to the unique case of the transformation of
the Judicial Academy from a project to a state institution with the mandate to enhance the
competency criteria and the merit based system for judges and prosecutors.
The basic hypothesis of the study is that the success of judicial reform is conditioned by the
application of competency criteria in the appointment, evaluation and career advancement
of judges and prosecutors.
T...he research confirms the hypothesis and leads to the conclusion that the judicial reform in
Serbia did not achieve significant successes. It concludes that both the international and
national partners contributed equally to the stagnation of the judicial reform process. While
international partners applied incoherent approaches, through their reform programming,
the national partners exercised a lack of genuine reform demand and commitment.
The joint actions of these development partners in the implementation of techniques of
isomorphic mimicry and the premature load bearing led to mixed results – the capacity of
the judiciary in Serbia has been increased to a certain extent, but the independence of the
judiciary has not been reached. The study, based on these conclusions provides
recommendations for the improvement of programming and implementation of judicial
reform such as through a coherent strategic programming mechanism, coordination of
development partners and depolarization of the reform process.
Faculty:
Универзитет у Београду, Факултет политичких наукаDate:
26-10-2015Keywords:
Demokratska tranzicija i konsolidacija / democratic transition and consolidation / razvojna pomoć / reforma pravosuđa / programiranje reforme / nezavisnost pravosuđa / stručnost nosilaca pravosudne funkcije / Pravosudna akademija / development assistance / judicial reform / reform programming / independence of judiciary / competency of judges and prosecutors / the Judicial AcademyRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
Покушај модернизације у Србији 1968-1972. Између "револуционарног курса" и реформских тежњи / Pokušaj modernizacije u Srbiji 1968-1972. Između "revolucionarnog kursa" i reformskih težnji
Бешлин, Миливој (Универзитет у Новом Саду, Филозофски факултет, 27-02-2015) -
Modelovanje i energetska optimizacija progresa katalitičkog reforminga benzina / Modeling and Energy Optimization of the Catalytic Naphtha Reforming Process
Stijepović, Mirko Z. (Универзитет у Београду, Технолошко-металуршки факултет, 19-09-2010) -
Socijalna sigurnost između države i tržišta
Perišić, Natalija (Универзитет у Београду, Факултет политичких наука, 24-04-2012)