Uloga iskustva i doživljaja u kritičkom mišljenju
The role of experience in critical thinking
Докторанд
Kuburić, AnaМентор
Govedarica, MilankoЧланови комисије
Govedarica, MilankoAnđelković, Miroslava
Lubardić, Bogdan
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о дисертацијиСажетак
Predmet istraživanja u doktorskoj disertaciji su pojmovi iskustvo i doživljaj
onako kako su se razvijali u istorijskom kontekstu, u različitim filozofskim tradicijama i
naučnim disciplinama, posebno struktura i dinamika doživljavanja u različitim
psihoterapijskim pravcima, te značaj doživljavanja za proces učenja i razvijanja
kritičkog mišljenja koje zadovoljava epistemološke i logičke standarde.
Cilj doktorske disertacije je da odgovori na pitanje da li proces doživljavanja
ima značajnu ulogu u kritičkom mišljenju. U prva dva poglavlja autorka dokazuje tezu
da zdrav odnos prema sopstvenom procesu doživljavanja značajno doprinosi uspešnosti
kritičkog mišljenja i definiše u čemu se sastoji zdrav odnos prema procesu
doživljavanja.
Da bi odgovorila na zadato pitanje, autorka se u prvom poglavlju bavi
istraživanjem šta je proces doživljavanja, kako on funkcioniše i šta sve obuhvata na
osnovu filozofskih, psiholoških i savremenih neuronaučnih istraživanja. Uradila je
istorijsku... analizu upotrebe pojmova iskustvo (nem. Erfahrung, engl. experience) i
doživljaj (nem. Erlebnis, engl. experience) u različitim filozofskim tradicijama u kojima
ovaj pojam ima značajnu eksplanatornu ulogu (kod Imanuela Kanta, Vilhelma Diltaja,
Edmunda Huserla, Hans-Georga Gadamera, Vilijama Džejmsa, Džona Djuija, Morisa
Merlo-Pontija, Danijela Deneta i Evana Tompsona). Koncepti doživljaja i doživljavanja
su zatim istraženi funkcionalnom i strukturalnom analizom procesa doživljavanja u
radovima začetnika različitih psihoterapijskih pravaca (Karla Rodžersa, Frica Perlsa,
Eugena Gendlina, Alberta Elisa). Uspostavlja jasnu vezu iskustva sa potrebama,
emocijama, interesima, verovanjima, svešću, samstvom, pamćenjem, mišljenjem i
saznanjem, koju na kraju obogaćuje neuronaučnim objašnjenjima Antonija Damazija.
Na osnovu korpusa znanja kojim raspolaže, nakon kvalitativne analize sadržaja ključnih
radova četrnaest navedenih autora, zaključuje da se pojam iskustva (u širem smislu koji
definiše, i koji obuhvata i proces doživljavanja) ne iscrpljuje u perceptivnim iskustvima,
emocionalnim iskustvima, svesnim iskustvima, već obuhvata sve ove vrste iskustava.
Autorka zaključuje da se za potrebe filozofskih rasprava i specifičnih ispitivanja pojam
iskustva često redukuje na neku od njih. Za definisanje iskustva u širem smislu ključne
su dve njegove osobina: prvo, da se javlja na granici između organizma i njegove
životne sredine, pre svega na površini kože i drugih organa čulno-motoričkog odgovora
(što je značajno za definisanje pojma iskustva u užem smislu, odnosno, na šta se računa
upotrebom izraza perceptivno iskustvo, i delom svesno iskustvo), i drugo, da se dalje
odvija unutar granica organizma, tj. da se odnosi na sve što se događa unutar granica
organizma u svakom trenutku i potencijalno je dostupno svesti (što je značajno za
definisanje pojma doživljaj, i na šta računamo upotrebom izraza svesno iskustvo,
iskustvo sopstva, iskustvo potrebe, emocinlano iskustvo, telesno iskustvo, itd.).
Prikaz dinamike iskušavanja/doživljavanja ključan je za dokazivanje uloge koju
iskustvo ima u formiranju kritičkog mišljenja u drugom poglavlju. Da bi povezala
proces doživljavanja sa znanjima o kritičkom mišljenju, autorka komparativnom
8
analizom istražuje definicije i komponente od kojih se sastoji kritičko mišljenje prema
mišljenju eminentnih teoretičara kritičkog mišljenja (Roberta Enisa, Ričarda Pola,
Džona Mekpeka i Harvija Sigela) i analizira upotrebu pojma iskustva kod njih.
U trećem, završnom poglavlju autorka razmatra kakve implikacije ima
pretpostavka da proces doživljavanja zauzima značajnu ulogu u kritičkom mišljenju na
koncepciju podučavanja u kritičkom mišljenju. Autorka razmatra teorijska opravdanja
kojima istaknuti metodičari učenja iz iskustva i doživljaja (Dejvid Kolb, Donald Šen,
Piter Džarvis, Hitkot Doroti, Bolton Gavin, Sesili O'Nil) opravdavaju upotrebe ovih
metoda, i utvrđuje teorijsku osnovu metodičkih postupaka takve vrste zaključcima o
funkcionisanju procesa doživljavanja i o epistemološkim parametrima kvaliteta
mišljenja izvedenog na temelju doživljavanja.
Zaključak rada je da teoretičari podučavanja u kritičkom mišljenju u svoje
sadržaje treba da uvedu instrukcije i informativne sadržaje o zdravom odnosu prema
sopstvenom procesu doživljavanja, ukazuju na ulogu koju emocije imaju u mišljenju,
podržavaju prepoznavanje ličnih i društvenih potreba u analiziranim pitanjima, i
otvoreno upućivanje na interese koji utiču na date debate. Sa druge strane, nedostaci
metodika učenja iz iskustva i doživljaja mogu biti prevaziđeni proširivanjem njihovih
metodika sadržajima o razvijanju kritičkog mišljenja prema određenim epistemološkim
i logičkim standardima.
The dissertation accomplished the objective to research notions of experience –
moving from the two notions of experience and experiencing in Serbian, iskustvo and
doživljaj, corresponding to the German Erfahrung and Erlebnis, through their
development across different traditions and science disciplines – examining afresh the
structure and dynamism of experiencing in various psychotherapeutic areas, as well as
its significance in the process of learning and developing critical thinking that fulfills
both epistemological and logical standards.
This doctorate dissertation aims to respond to the question as to whether
experiencing has a significant role for critical thinking. In the first couple of chapters,
the author presents the thesis that a sound personal relationship toward one`s own
process of experiencing contributes significantly to critical thinking and defines the
content of a sound relation to the very process of experiencing.
In order to answer these questions, in... the first chapter the author investigates
what the process of experiencing is, how it operates and what it encompasses, based on
philosophical, psychological and contemporary neurological scientific research. The
author carries out a historical analysis of the use of the notion of experience in different
philosophical traditions where this notion has a significant explanatory role (in the
philosophy of Immanuel Kant, Wilhelm Dilthey, Edmund Husserl, Hans Georg
Gadamer, William James, John Dewey, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Daniel Dennett and
Evan Thomson). The concepts of experience and experiencing are then examined in a
functional and structural analysis of the work of the founders of different
psychotherapeutic approaches (Carl Rogers, Fritz Perls, Eugen Gendline, and Albert
Ellis). This establishes a clear connection between experience and needs, emotions,
interests, beliefs, consciousness, self, memory, thinking and comprehension.
Subsequently, a richer understanding of this link is outlined with reference to the
neuroscientific explanations of Antonio Damasio. The dissertation conducts a
qualitative analysis of key works written by the 14 above-mentioned authors, showing
that the notion of experience – in a broader sense that she defines, and also encompasses
the process of experiencing – is not solely identified with either perceptive, emotional
and conscious experience, but rather it encompasses all those types of experience. The
author shows at the same time that, for the sake of philosophical debates and specific
research enquiries, the notion of experience is often reduced to one particular type. Two
of its characteristics are crucial for defining experience in a broader sense: firstly, that it
occurs at the border between organism and environment, primarily on the surface of the
skin and other organs of motor-sensory response (which is significant for the narrower
meaning of the term experience, which is actually what the use of the expressions
perceptual experience and partially conscious experience counts on); and secondly, that
it continues within the limits of the organism, i.e. that it refers to everything that
happens within the limits of the organism at any moment and is potentially accessible to
consciousness (which is significant for the meaning of the process of experiencing, and
which is what we count on by using the term conscious experience, self experience,
experience of need, emotional experience, bodily experience, etc.).
10
The presentation of the dynamics of experience/experiencing is key to
establishing the role that experience has in the formation of critical thinking in the
second chapter. In order to link the process of experiencing with knowledge about
critical thinking, the author uses a comparative analysis to investigate the definitions
and components of critical thinking according to the approaches taken by eminent
theoreticians about critical thinking (such as Robert Ennis, Richard Paul, John McPeck
and Harvey Siegel). The author also analyzes the use of the notion of experience in the
theories of all these authors.
In the third and final chapter, the author reviews the implications of the position
that the process of experiencing plays a significant role in critical thinking for the
conception of the teaching of critical thinking. This chapter reviews the theoretic
justifications by which prominent methodologists of learning by experience ground their
use of these methods, and establishes clearer theoretic basis for methodical procedures
of that kind using conclusions about the functioning of the process of experiencing and
of the epistemological parameters of the quality of thinking based on experiencing. The
prominent thinkers engaged with in this review of the methodology of learning by
experience are as follows: David Kolb, Donald Schön, Peter Jarvis, Dorothy Heathcote,
Gavin Bolton and Cecily O`Neill.
The conclusion of this dissertation is that theorists of the teaching of critical
thinking should provide instructions and informative content about what constitutes a
sound or healthy relationship to one`s own process of experiencing; the role of emotions
in forming one`s opinion should also be pointed out; recognition of underlying personal
and societal needs in analysing issues should be supported; and clear reference should
be made to the interests that affect debates. Equally, it is seen that shortcomings in
methodologies of learning from experience can be overcome through expanding these
methodologies with content about what it means to develop critical thinking according
to certain epistemological and logical standards.