Смањење економских неједнакости као претпоставка мира: случај Латинске Америке
Author
Džuverović, Nemanja
Mentor
Nakarada, RadmilaCommittee members
Simić, DraganGrečić, Vladimir
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Рад се бави истраживањем економских неједнакости као могуће једног од доминантних узрока насилних сукоба унутар држава на почетку 21. века. При томе, постојећа економска структура узима се као кључни разлог високе стопе економске неједнакости. Аутор кроз анализу кретања међународне и унутрашње неједнакости у другој половини 20. века показује како је управо либерализација и укидање бројних тржишних и не-тржишних баријера главни узрок драстичног пораста два облика неједнакости која су достигла историјски највиши забележени ниво...
The dissertation is researching economic inequalities as, possibly, one of the dominant
causes of intra state conflicts as the beginning of the 21st century. By doing that, work
is focusing on present economic structure as the key reason for high rates of economic
inequality. The author analyzes the trends of international and internal inequalities in
the second half of the 20th century and concludes that the main cause of the dramatic
increase in both types is market liberalization and elimination of numerous trade and
non-trade barriers that led to historically highest recorded inequality levels. In such
circumstances, the author concludes that the inequality ceases to be purely economic
category and attain wider, social impact.
The process of transformation inequality into a violent conflict is explained by using
three different theoretical frameworks. The first one (The Resource Mobilization
Theory) states that simple existence of inequality is not sufficient for the formation of
v...iolent conflict, and that the presence of other elements is necessary as well. By placing
importance on categories of interest, organization, mobilization and collective action
theory emphasizes the importance of social factors in conflict formation. In addition,
Theory of Horizontal Inequalities is also considered due to it’s emphasizing on
importance of group membership for economic status of individuals. Finally, into the
consideration is taken the Theory of Relative Deprivation which is focusing on the
importance of psychological factors, i.e. frustration (in conflict formation) which occurs
when large discrepancies between desired and current state present itself. The author
notes consistency of this theory in explaining nature of economic inequalities, which is
why the concept of relative deprivation is taken as the most suitable one for the
explanation of the relationship inequality-conflict.