Parlamentarna kontrola državne uprave u Republici Srbiji

Abstract

Apstrakt: Predmet istraživanja doktorske disertacije je parlamentarna kontrola državne uprave u Republici Srbiji. Pod predmetom parlamentarne kontrole podrazumeva se kontrola zakonitosti akata i radnji državne uprave, ali i kontrola njihove celishodnosti. Specifičnost upravne delatnosti ogleda se u dosta širokoj slobodi, kojom raspolažu organi uprave, naročito u vršenju diskrecione vlasti. Zbog toga, prilikom kontrole upravne vlasti, poseban značaj pripada pitanju ocene celishodnosti rada uprave. Politička kontrola usmerena ka vladavini prava i uspostavljanju pravne, a ne partijske države. Ona treba da dopunjava pravnu kontrolu, jer imaju isti cilj. Parlamentarna kontrola spaja oba ova oblika kontrole i predstavlja ključnu formu institucionalizovane kontrole. Ovde parlament ceni da li uprava sprovodi postavljenu politiku i ostvaruje određene ciljeve uspostavljene pravnim poretkom, odnosno da li vrši diskreciona ovlašćenja u skladu sa javnim interesom, kako to parlament smatra da bi bilo celishodno. Cilj istraživanja jeste analiza svih oblika i mehanizama parlamentarne kontrole uprave, kako komparativno, tako i u Republici Srbiji, a to su: poslanička pitanja, obaveštenja i objašnjenja, interpelacija, glasanje nepoverenje vladi, parlamentarni odbori, javno slušanje, izveštaji organa, organizacija i tela i kontrola budžeta kao mehanizam parlamentarne kontrole. Potrebno je istaći da vanpravni činioci mogu, ponekad, i znatno snažnije da utiču na rad organa uprave, nego što to čine pravni činioci. Zbog toga je istraživanje političke kontrole uprave neophodno radi sagledavanja celokupnog sistema kontrole nad upravnom vlasti, a domet i efikasnost iste je od velikog značaja za dalji proces stvaranja odgovorne i dobre javne uprave, kao i proces očuvanja dostignutog nivoa i dogradnje pravne države.

Abstract: The subject of research of this doctoral dissertation is parliamentary control of state administration in the Republic of Serbia. The notion of parliamentary control implies the control of the legality of acts and activities of state administration, as well as the control of their expediency. The specificity of the administration’s activity is seen in quite a broad form of freedom, which administrative bodies have, especially in enacting discretionary power. Therefore, when controlling the administrative power, special significance is given to the matter of the assessment of expediency of the administration’s work. Political control, directed at the rule of law and the establishment of a legal, and not partisan state, needs to complement legal control, because they have the same goal. Parliamentary control joins both these forms of control and it represents the key form of institutionalized control. Here the parliament assesses if the administration is carrying out the defined policies and achieving certain goals defined by the legal order, i.e. if it is enacting its discretionary authorizations in accordance with public interest, in a way in which the parliament would see it as expedient. The goal of the research is to analyze all forms and mechanisms of parliamentary control of the administration, both comparatively and in the Republic of Serbia, and these are: parliamentary questions, notices and explanations, interpellation, vote of no confidence in the government, parliamentary boards, public hearing, reports of certain bodies, organizations and bodies, and budget control as a mechanism of parliamentary control. It is necessary to point out that non-legal factors may sometimes impact the work of the administrative bodies even more strongly than legal factors. That is why the research of political control of the administration is necessary in order to see the entire system of control over the administrative power, while its range and efficiency are of great importance for the further process of creation of a responsible and good public administration, as well as the process of preserving the achieved level and improving the state of law.