Trauma i mentalno zdravlje mladih: medijatorska uloga afektivne vezanosti, mentalizacije i disocijacije
Докторанд
Bogdanović, Aleksandra S.Ментор
Stefanović-Stanojević, TatjanaЧланови комисије
Mitrović, MilicaGavrilov-Jerković, Vesna
Georgievska, Sofija
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о дисертацијиСажетак
The aim of this research was examining the effect of early trauma experiences
on the development of maladaptive mental health outcomes, as well as to test
the effects of attachment, mentalization and dissociation in this relationship.
The sample was was comprised of 121 adolescents from foster care in
Republic of Serbia, aged 11 to 18. The respondents filled in a battery of
instruments, including Childhood Trauma Questionnaire – CTQ (Bernstain i
Fink, 1998), Relationship Questionaire-Clinical version RQ-CV (Holmes &
Lyons-Ruth, 2006), The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire, RFQ (Fonagy
et al., 2016), Dissociative experience scale for adolescents, A-DES
(Armstrong, Putnam, Carlson, Libero & Smith, 1997) and Child behavior
checklist-youthself report (Achenbach & Rescorla, 2001). Our findings
suggest that dissociation had statistically significant mediating role in the
relationship between trauma and internalizing (b=.1.81, SE=.04, p<.001
externalizing (b=2.86, SE=.49, p<.001) and socia...l problems (b=.43, SE=.04,
p<.001). Attachment and mentalization can be considered as a moderators of
the examined relationships, since results of models testing moderation effects
showed that trauma and attachment security (b=-.05, SE=.01, p<.001) and
trauma and profound-distrust (b=.99, SE=.01, p<.001) had a significant
interaction effect on internalizing symptoms; that trauma and
hypomentalization (b=.01, SE=.00,p<.001) had a significant interaction effect
on externalizing symptoms; while trauma and hypermetalization had a
significant interaction effect on externalizing symptoms (b=-.01, SE=.00,
p<.05) and social problems (b=-.005, SE=.001, p<.001).
The obtained results were interpreted within the context of contemporary
theoretical conceptualizations focusing on resilience (secure attachment style,
optimal reflective functioning, hypermentalizing) and vulnerability (profounddistrust,
hypomentalizing) factors in response to trauma. Practical
implications and limitations of this study were discussed