Ka transcendentalnom zasnivanju javnog prava
Towards transcendental grounding of public right
Author
Govedarica, Jelena J.
Mentor
Babić, JovanCommittee members
Cekić, Nenad
Dobrijević, Aleksandar

Draškić-Vićanović, Iva
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Ova studija nudi obuhvatnu interpretaciju Kantovih stavova o uslovima mogućnosti moralnog
napretka i moralizacije čovečanstva, kao ostvarenja krajnje svrhe stvaranja prirode. Iako je
vaspitanje pojedinaca i nacija uslov koji najviše doprinosi moralizaciji čovečanstva, njen jedini
nužan uslov mogućnosti je transcendentalno zasnovano javno pravo. Takvo pravo zadovoljava
uslove opšteg i nužnog važenja, jer se zasniva isključivo na slobodi. U tom smislu moralni napredak
čovečanstva zahteva strogo ograničavanje samovolje ljudi putem apriornih juridičkih principa i
učestaliju determinaciju njihove volje samom predstavom moralnog zakona. Osnovna teza studije
jeste da juridička sloboda čovečanstva može u potpunosti biti garantovana ukoliko se uspostavi
svetska federativna republika, dok se etička sloboda čovečanstva osvaja kroz stalnu borbu sa
radikalnim zlom, koja ima više izgleda na uspeh ako ljudi osnuju carstvo vrline, pa je ostvarenje
krajnje svrhe stvaranja prirode zamislivo te...k pod pretpostavkom konstitucije svetske juridičke i
etičke države. Povrh toga, studija pruža detaljan prikaz najvažnijih ideja Kantove filozofije javnog
prava, kako transcendentalnih, tako i empirijskih principa. Uloga empirijske pravne i političke
teorije je da pokaže na koji je način moguće u što većoj meri realizovati metafizičke principe prava,
dok Kantove antropološke teorije i refleksije o istorijskom razvoju čovečanstva treba da pokažu na
koji način ljudska priroda ide u prilog ostvarivanju najviših principa javnog prava, ponekad čak i
protiv namera ljudi. Ove teorije, zajedno sa njegovom filozofijom vaspitanja, pokazuju koje
smernice ljudi treba da prate na putu ka transcendentalnom javnom pravu, ne bi li čovečanstvo
moglo u moralnom (juridičkom i etičkom) smislu efikasnije i lakše napredovati.
This dissertation provides a comprehensive interpretation of Kant’s views on the conditions of
possibility of moral progress and moralization, understood as the achievement of the final purpose
of nature. Although education of people and nations is the condition that contributes the most to the
achievement of moralization, its only necessary condition of possibility is transcendentally
grounded public right. This form of law meets the conditions of universality and necessity, because
it is based solely on freedom. In this sense, moral progress of humanity requires strict restrictions on
every person’s freedom of choice in accordance with a priori juridical principles and a more
frequent determination of their will merely by the representation of the moral law. The main thesis
of this dissertation is that juridical freedom of humanity could only be fully guaranteed if the world
federal republic is established, while the ethical freedom of humanity could be attained only
throug...h constant struggle against the radical evil, which is more likely to succeed if people establish
the ethical community; thus, the achievement of the final purpose of nature is conceivable only
under the presumption of the constitution of the legal world state and the ethical world state.
Additionally, this dissertation provides a detailed analysis of the most important ideas of Kant's
philosophy of public right, both its transcendental and empirical side. The role of the empirical legal
and political theory is to explain how metaphysical principles of right could be realized to the
greatest possible extent, while Kant's anthropological theories and his reflections on the historical
development of humanity should show the way human nature works in favour of the
implementation of the pure principles of public right, sometimes even against people's
intentions. These theories, together with his philosophy of education, show what guidelines people
should follow on the way towards transcendental public right, so that humanity’s moral (legal and
ethical) progress would be more efficient and less difficult.